Free software Trialware = Download Free software and also open source code but some parts are trial/shareware. Free software = Download Free software and also open source code also known as FOSS (Free and Open Source Software). Freeware Trialware = Download Free software but some parts are trial/shareware. RECENTLY UPDATED = The software has been updated the last 31 days. NO LONGER DEVELOPED = The software hasn't been updated in over 5 years. Type and download NO MORE UPDATES? = The software hasn't been updated in over 2 years. ![]() Version number / Beta version number / Update version number and when it whas released. Explanation: NEW SOFTWARE= New tool since your last visit NEW VERSION= New version since your last visit NEW REVIEW= New review since your last visit NEW VERSION= New version Latest version
0 Comments
![]() One compatible with the way you're already thinking and working. ![]() Instead, we're trying to build an extension of your mind. We would fall into the same trap as every other tool, forcing you to adapt to structures and mental models that conflict with the way your brain naturally operates. If our goal was to create a NEW mind, we'd have to change the way your mind works right now. To create a tool that complements how your mind works, we first have to understand what that means, both philosophically and practically. ![]() And knowing this, I believe there is a way to leverage how our mind already works, rather than trying to change it. They promise a better, more efficient *you.* But the assumptions our tools make about us are not who we are.Īre we failing to keep our shit in order, or are our tools failing us? Our tools tend to see the ideal version of us, which is also why we're attracted to them. There's a disconnect between the way we like to organize ourselves and how our tools like to organize us. Our carefully considered systems and structures become obsolete only shortly after we put them in place. Our note-taking apps and hard drives have become graveyards of information. Yet we spend hours managing, organizing and cleaning up the mess these tools create for us. Modern tools pull us in with flashy features and the promise of an easier life. I shared my frustration with the current landscape, how instead of mastering our tools, we’ve let our tools become our masters. For the first time last week, I wrote about a new project that has consumed a large part of the last year for me. However it exaggerated Antarctica and the distances between East Asia and North America, giving it a score of 4.563.Īmerican architect and inventor Buckminster Fuller's 'dymaxion' world map used a polyhedral net intended to be built as a 3D globe. The Winkel Tripel projection used an oblong shape with less distortions than the Mercator map. ![]() The well-known Mercator projection, which created a square map of the world by stretching the polar regions, received a score of 8.296 on their scale. The lower the score, the better the map, with a score of 0 being perfect. In 2007 Gott and Goldberg created a ranking system that gave every 2D map of the Earth a score for its accuracy based on how much it distorted key elements like distances and area. The new map is the latest example of years of research and critique by Gott and his colleagues on existing 2D maps of Earth. "We believe it is the most accurate flat map of Earth yet," they wrote in the study. The group published their efforts on the pre-print open access repository arXiv. ![]() Gott was joined by Princeton mathematician Robert Vanderbrei and physicist David Goldberg from Drexel University in Philadelphia to create the map. Gott, Vanderbei and Goldberg/Princeton University The group said they believed it was the most accurate 2-D map of the Earth ever produced. Richard Gott, Robert Vanderbei and David Goldberg. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |